Chosewood v. Jones
This text of 92 S.E. 646 (Chosewood v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A suit by a grantor against a grantee, to cancel a deed conveying land, on the ground of fraud practiced by the grantee inducing execution of the deed, and to recover possession of the land and inesne profits, is not a suit respecting title to land, within the meaning of the constitution, which is required to be brought in the county where the land lies, but is a suit for equitable relief, and should be brought in the county of the residence of the defendant. Smith v. Bryan, 34 Ga. 53; Clayton v. Stetson, 101 Ga. 634 (28 S. E. 983) ; Martin v. Gaissert, 134 Ga. 34 (67 S. E. 536); Vizard v. Moody, 115 Ga. 491 (41 S. E. 997) ; Frazier v. Broyles, 145 Ga. 642 (89 S. E. 743).
A suit having been instituted in the county where the land lay, and the petition alleging that the defendant resided in a different county, it was erroneous to overrule a demurrer which raised the question of jurisdiction. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 646, 146 Ga. 804, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chosewood-v-jones-ga-1917.