Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 28, 2011

Docket2011-3013

StatusUnpublished

This text of Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of A11peaIs for the FederaI Circuit TASHIEK TERESSA HAWKINS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, ' Respondent. 2011-3013 Petiti0n for review of the Merit Syste1ns Protection Board in case no. DC0752100663-I-1. _ ON MOTION ' ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board as the respondent, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above (2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

HAWKINS V. MSPB CC. S 2 FOR THE COURT 2 8 /s/ Jan Horbal_\[ Date J an Horbaly Tashiek Teressa Hawkins Ca1neron Cohick, Esq. C1erk Stephanie Conley, Esq. (Copy Of Petiti0ner's Informa1 Brief Enc1osed) FlLEB . u.s. cover 0F APPeALs FOR fm-: renew amount JAN 2 8 2011 JANl'1$i¥BALY CLERK~

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of A11peaIs for the FederaI Circuit TASHIEK TERESSA HAWKINS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, ' Respondent. 2011-3013 Petiti0n for review of the Merit Syste1ns Protection Board in case no. DC0752100663-I-1. _ ON MOTION ' ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to reform the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board as the respondent, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above (2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

HAWKINS V. MSPB CC. S 2 FOR THE COURT 2 8 /s/ Jan Horbal_\[ Date J an Horbaly Tashiek Teressa Hawkins Ca1neron Cohick, Esq. C1erk Stephanie Conley, Esq. (Copy Of Petiti0ner's Informa1 Brief Enc1osed) FlLEB . u.s. cover 0F APPeALs FOR fm-: renew amount JAN 2 8 2011 JANl'1$i¥BALY CLERK~

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Hawkins v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.