Hawaii v. Trump
Opinion
ORDER
The full court was advised of the petition for initial hearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc before the limited en banc court. Another judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc before the full court. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of initial en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Therefore, initial en banc proceedings are concluded, and all remaining issues will be decided by the three-judge panel. The denial of the request for initial hearing en banc does not preclude any party from filing a petition for rehearing en banc pursuant to the applicable rules following issuance of the panel opinion.
This case is scheduled for oral argument before the three-judge panel at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, May 15,2017, in Seattle Washington.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
864 F.3d 994 (Hawaii v. Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.