Hawaii v. Trump

864 F.3d 994, 2017 WL 1420813, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7037

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: April 21, 2017
• Docket: No. 17-15589
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge and En Banc Coordinator:

The full court was advised of the petition for initial hearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc before the limited en banc court. Another judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc before the full court. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of initial en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Therefore, initial en banc proceedings are concluded, and all remaining issues will be decided by the three-judge panel. The denial of the request for initial hearing en banc does not preclude any party from filing a petition for rehearing en banc pursuant to the applicable rules following issuance of the panel opinion.

This case is scheduled for oral argument before the three-judge panel at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, May 15,2017, in Seattle Washington.