Hatcher v. City of Albany

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hatcher v. City of Albany

241 S.E.2d 619, 144 Ga. App. 503, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1655

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 9, 1978

Docket54878

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 241 S.E.2d 619 (Hatcher v. City of Albany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hatcher v. City of Albany, 241 S.E.2d 619, 144 Ga. App. 503, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1655 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Judge.

Hatcher rented a pavilion from the City of Albany as the location for a Christmas party. After the party he was removing various merchandise and equipment from the pavilion and loading it into vehicles outside. It was approximately 10:45 p.m. and having made several trips, he was aware that there were no lights on outside the pavilion. Hatcher, in carrying a box from the stoop after pushing open the door, slipped and fell off the last step, and in his own words, "I went topsy-turvy and the box went one way and I went the other.”

Plaintiff brought this action against the City of Albany, as defendant, alleging that the aforementioned fall and resulting injuries were the proximate result of defendant’s failure to properly maintain the premises which it held "open to the plaintiff for plaintiffs use and defendant’s financial benefit.” After the taking of plaintiffs deposition, defendant moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted defendant’s motion, and plaintiff appeals, contending that there are genuine issues of material fact. Held:

The party opposing a motion for summary judgment is entitled to a liberal construction in his favor of the pleadings and evidence. Central Soya Co. v. Bundrick, 137 Ga. App. 63, 67 (1) (222 SE2d 852) and cits. The plaintiff alleged that, "the steps leading to the hall were unlighted and unsafe for normal use.’’(Emphasis supplied.) Liberally construed, the description "unsafe” is sufficient *504 to raise issues regarding a dangerous or defective condition of the steps, separate from the allegation that the steps were unlighted. No evidence having been produced which pierces this allegation of plaintiffs complaint, the court erred m granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Guthrie v. Monumental Properties, Inc., 141 Ga. App. 21-23 (2) (232 SE2d 369).

Submitted November 1, 1977 Decided January 9, 1978. Vansant & Engram, B. Sam Engram, Jr., Alfred N. Corriere, for appellant. Perry, Walters, Lippitt & Custer, Jesse W. Walters, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Bell, C.J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMurray, Judge.

Hatcher rented a pavilion from the City of Albany as the location for a Christmas party. After the party he was removing various merchandise and equipment from the pavilion and loading it into vehicles outside. It was approximately 10:45 p.m. and having made several trips, he was aware that there were no lights on outside the pavilion. Hatcher, in carrying a box from the stoop after pushing open the door, slipped and fell off the last step, and in his own words, "I went topsy-turvy and the box went one way and I went the other.”

Plaintiff brought this action against the City of Albany, as defendant, alleging that the aforementioned fall and resulting injuries were the proximate result of defendant’s failure to properly maintain the premises which it held "open to the plaintiff for plaintiffs use and defendant’s financial benefit.” After the taking of plaintiffs deposition, defendant moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted defendant’s motion, and plaintiff appeals, contending that there are genuine issues of material fact. Held:

The party opposing a motion for summary judgment is entitled to a liberal construction in his favor of the pleadings and evidence. Central Soya Co. v. Bundrick, 137 Ga. App. 63, 67 (1) (222 SE2d 852) and cits. The plaintiff alleged that, "the steps leading to the hall were unlighted and unsafe for normal use.’’(Emphasis supplied.) Liberally construed, the description "unsafe” is sufficient *504 to raise issues regarding a dangerous or defective condition of the steps, separate from the allegation that the steps were unlighted. No evidence having been produced which pierces this allegation of plaintiffs complaint, the court erred m granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Guthrie v. Monumental Properties, Inc., 141 Ga. App. 21-23 (2) (232 SE2d 369).

Submitted November 1, 1977 Decided January 9, 1978. Vansant & Engram, B. Sam Engram, Jr., Alfred N. Corriere, for appellant. Perry, Walters, Lippitt & Custer, Jesse W. Walters, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Bell, C.J., and Smith, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.E.2d 619, 144 Ga. App. 503, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hatcher-v-city-of-albany-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack