Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hastings v. State

Hastings v. State

745 So. 2d 959, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13392, 1997 WL 740808
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hastings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 670 So. 2d 1176 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1997·No. No. 97-2992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

We deny the motion for rehearing, but write to clarify that the trial court’s order denying both rule 3.850 relief and the petition for writ of error coram nobis is AFFIRMED.

FARMER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hastings v. State, 745 So. 2d 959, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13392, 1997 WL 740808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

745 So. 2d 959 (Hastings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.