Hastings v. State

742 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1999 WL 821272
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1999·No. No. 99-3104·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Robert Hastings petitions for a writ of error coram nobis, contending that a plea he entered in 1974 was involuntary. Although he has completed the sentence, [515] the conviction has been mentioned as a factor considered by the Florida Parole Commission in reaching its decision to not authorize an effective parole release date.

Hastings’ remedy, if any, is a motion for post-conviction relief directed to the appropriate circuit court. Wood v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S240, — So.2d-, 1999 WL 334750 (Fla. May 27,1999); Barbz v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2019, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we deny the petition (and petitioner’s motions) without prejudice to Hastings’ right to file a motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hastings v. State, 742 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1999 WL 821272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

742 So. 2d 514 (Hastings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Bartz v. State
740 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)