Hastings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hastings v. State

742 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1999 WL 821272

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1999

DocketNo. 99-3104

StatusPublished

This text of 742 So. 2d 514 (Hastings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hastings v. State, 742 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1999 WL 821272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Robert Hastings petitions for a writ of error coram nobis, contending that a plea he entered in 1974 was involuntary. Although he has completed the sentence, [515]*515the conviction has been mentioned as a factor considered by the Florida Parole Commission in reaching its decision to not authorize an effective parole release date.

Hastings’ remedy, if any, is a motion for post-conviction relief directed to the appropriate circuit court. Wood v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S240, — So.2d-, 1999 WL 334750 (Fla. May 27,1999); Barbz v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2019, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we deny the petition (and petitioner’s motions) without prejudice to Hastings’ right to file a motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Robert Hastings petitions for a writ of error coram nobis, contending that a plea he entered in 1974 was involuntary. Although he has completed the sentence, [515]*515the conviction has been mentioned as a factor considered by the Florida Parole Commission in reaching its decision to not authorize an effective parole release date.

Hastings’ remedy, if any, is a motion for post-conviction relief directed to the appropriate circuit court. Wood v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S240, — So.2d-, 1999 WL 334750 (Fla. May 27,1999); Barbz v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2019, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we deny the petition (and petitioner’s motions) without prejudice to Hastings’ right to file a motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

742 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13669, 1999 WL 821272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hastings-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack