Hassan v. Hedrick
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1254
NASSER HASSAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. A. HEDRICK; S. B. MASON; C. W. TAGGERT; Z. D. TAYLOR; J. M. TRAVIS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STAN G. BARRY; JOHN/JANE DOES, ##1-10; JOHN/JANE DOES, ##11-20,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00385-TSE-LO)
Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nasser Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’CONNELL, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Nasser Hassan appeals the district court’s orders
entering judgment in accordance with a jury verdict and granting
summary judgment in favor of another defendant. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Hassan’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hassan v. Hedrick (Hassan v. Hedrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.