Hassan v. Hedrick

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2007·No. 06-1254·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1254

NASSER HASSAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. A. HEDRICK; S. B. MASON; C. W. TAGGERT; Z. D. TAYLOR; J. M. TRAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STAN G. BARRY; JOHN/JANE DOES, ##1-10; JOHN/JANE DOES, ##11-20,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00385-TSE-LO)

Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nasser Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’CONNELL, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Nasser Hassan appeals the district court’s orders

entering judgment in accordance with a jury verdict and granting

summary judgment in favor of another defendant. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Hassan’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hassan v. Hedrick, (4th Cir. 2007).

Hassan v. Hedrick (Hassan v. Hedrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.