Hassan v. Hedrick

Fourth Circuit

Hassan v. Hedrick

218 F. App'x 290

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2007·No. No. 06-1254·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Nasser Hassan appeals the district court’s orders entering judgment in accordance with a jury verdict and granting summary judgment in favor of another defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hassan’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Nasser Hassan appeals the district court’s orders entering judgment in accordance with a jury verdict and granting summary judgment in favor of another defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hassan’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hassan v. Hedrick, 218 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

218 F. App'x 290 (Hassan v. Hedrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.