Haskell v. Commissioner

2 B.T.A. 1300, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2080
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 11, 1925·No. Docket No. 4335.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

. This is an appeal from the determination of a deficiency in income tax of George S. Haskell, deceased, for the calendar year 1921 in the amount of $236.27, arising from the holding of the Commissioner that a profit of $2,652.83 upon the sale of certain real estate was income to George S. Haskell during his lifetime. The executrix alleged in her petition that the said profit of $2,652.83 belonged to her.

FINDINGS OE FACT.

During the calendar year 1921 George S. Haskell, now deceased, was a resident of Chicago, Ill., engaged in business as a partner with one Isadore A. Grossman. In January, 1913, Kathryn M. Haskell, wife of George S. Haskell, and Isadore A. Grossman each contributed $1,500 for the purchase of certain real estate in the City of Chicago at a cost of $6,000; $3,000 being paid in cash and a mortgage given for $3,000. The title to the property was taken in the name of Kathryn M. Haskell. In December, 1921, this property was sold by Kathryn M. Haskell for $11,305.65, resulting in a total profit of $5,305.65. One-half of this profit belonged to Isadore A. Grossman and one-half, or $2,652.83, belonged to Kathryn M. Haskell.

DECISION.

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskell v. Commissioner, 2 B.T.A. 1300, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2080 (bta 1925).

2 B.T.A. 1300 (Haskell v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haskell v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 1300 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)