Harvey v. Murray
136 Mass. 377, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 112
Opinion
C. Allen, J.
This case falls fully within the decision in Drake v. White, 117 Mass. 10. Indeed, the mention in the contract now before us, that customary wear and tear are excepted from the defendant’s agreement, furnishes an additional reason for holding that injury from inevitable accident is not excepted.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harvey v. Murray, 136 Mass. 377, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 112 (Mass. 1884).
136 Mass. 377 (Harvey v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perreault v. Circle Club, Inc.
95 N.E.2d 204 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Amiro v. Crowley
152 N.E. 78 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Rowe v. Inhabitants of Peabody
93 N.E. 604 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Grady v. Schweinler
113 N.W. 1031 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)
Hawkes v. Kehoe
79 N.E. 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Boston Molasses Co. v. Commonwealth
79 N.E. 827 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Jaminet v. American Storage & Moving Co.
84 S.W. 128 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Moore v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n
101 F. 591 (Second Circuit, 1900)
Tindall v. McCarthy
22 S.E. 734 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1895)
Seevers v. Gabel
27 L.R.A. 733 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)
Lothrop v. Thayer
138 Mass. 466 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)