Hartsock v. Scaccia
84 A.D.3d 1699, 922 N.Y.S.2d 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartsock v. Scaccia. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 A.D.3d 1697 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 6, 2011·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T. Scaccia’s cross claim against them.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia (84 AD3d 1697 [2011]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hartsock v. Scaccia, 84 A.D.3d 1699, 922 N.Y.S.2d 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
84 A.D.3d 1699 (Hartsock v. Scaccia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hartsock v. Scaccia
84 A.D.3d 1697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)