Hartsock v. Scaccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hartsock v. Scaccia

84 A.D.3d 1699, 922 N.Y.S.2d 832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2011

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.3d 1699 (Hartsock v. Scaccia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartsock v. Scaccia, 84 A.D.3d 1699, 922 N.Y.S.2d 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T. Scaccia’s cross claim against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia (84 AD3d 1697 [2011]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T. Scaccia’s cross claim against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia (84 AD3d 1697 [2011]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.3d 1699, 922 N.Y.S.2d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartsock-v-scaccia-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack