Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hartman v. State

Hartman v. State

48 So. 3d 1032, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18665, 2010 WL 4962894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hartman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11767 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 2010·No. No. 4D09-5005·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order of October 23, 2009, which dismisses appellant’s “letter/motion” as frivolous and forwards a copy of the order to the Department of Corrections. See Johnson v. State, 44 So.3d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). That order does not include language barring future pro se filings in the circuit court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Fitzgerald v. State, 18 So.3d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Epps v. State, 941 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); see also Thomas v. State, 1 So.3d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). This court’s affirmance does not prevent appellant from seeking review of any such order issued by the trial court.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartman v. State, 48 So. 3d 1032, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18665, 2010 WL 4962894 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

48 So. 3d 1032 (Hartman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epps v. State
941 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Fitzgerald v. State
18 So. 3d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Johnson v. State
44 So. 3d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Thomas v. State
1 So. 3d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)