Johnson v. State
This text of 201 So. 3d 8 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant filed an Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, requesting this Court to compel the trial court to rule on his “Motion for State’s Fraud Practice on Sentencing Court.” After this Court denied the petition, a copy of the petition was sent to the trial court. Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying the defendant’s Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, noting that the petition was moot because the trial court already had ruled on the defendant’s Motion for State’s Fraud Practice on Sentencing Court. As the trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain the defendant’s Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, we vacate the trial court’s order denying the petition.
Order vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 3d 8, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.