Hartman v. Hartman
354 S.E.2d 239, 319 N.C. 396
This text of 354 S.E.2d 239 (Hartman v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hartman v. Hartman, 354 S.E.2d 239, 319 N.C. 396 (N.C. 1987).
Opinion
Raleigh Wilbur HARTMAN
v.
Elsie H. HARTMAN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Morrow, Long and Black by John F. Morrow and Clifton R. Long, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.
Petree, Stockton & Robinson by W. Thompson Comerford, Jr. and Jane C. Jackson, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
WEBB and WHICHARD, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hartman v. Hartman
354 S.E.2d 239 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
354 S.E.2d 239, 319 N.C. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-v-hartman-nc-1987.