Hartigan v. Kurian

224 A.D.2d 299, 638 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1086
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about June 27, 1995, which, inter alia, denied defendants Kurian and Palmer’s motion for a change of venue to Westchester County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A motion to change venue on the ground of the convenience of witnesses is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Pittman v Maher, 202 AD2d 172, 176). The general statements of several nonparty post-operative treating physicians that it would be more convenient for them to testify in Westchester County, rather than Bronx County, are insufficient to warrant a change of venue (see, Clark v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 170 AD2d 271), especially in view of the long delay in making the motion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hartigan v. Kurian, 224 A.D.2d 299, 638 N.Y.S.2d 33, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 299 (Hartigan v. Kurian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.
51 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Timan v. Sayegh
49 A.D.3d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Tonioli v. Hilbert
2004 NY Slip Op 50049(U) (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2004)
Connor v. Rami I, Inc.
234 A.D.2d 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)