Connor v. Rami I, Inc.

234 A.D.2d 58, 650 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12313

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered January 23, 1996, which denied third-party [59] defendant’s motion for a change of venue to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants concede that New York County is a proper venue. The motion therefore was addressed to the sound discretion of the IAS Court, and there was no improvident exercise of such discretion (Hartigan v Kurian, 224 AD2d 299). There was an insufficient showing that nonparty material witnesses would be inconvenienced by trial of this action in New York County (see, Heinemann v Grunfeld, 224 AD2d 204; Klugman v Food Emporium, 226 AD2d 321). We have considered appellants’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Connor v. Rami I, Inc., 234 A.D.2d 58, 650 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 58 (Connor v. Rami I, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heinemann v. Grunfeld
224 A.D.2d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Hartigan v. Kurian
224 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Klugman v. Food Emporium, Inc.
226 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)