Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Hartford Acc. Ind. v. A. Petrucci Con., No. Cv94 31 61 84 S (May 22, 1996)

Hartford Acc. Ind. v. A. Petrucci Con., No. Cv94 31 61 84 S (May 22, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4332-WWW
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMay 22, 1996
DocketNo. CV94 31 61 84 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4332-WWW (Hartford Acc. Ind. v. A. Petrucci Con., No. Cv94 31 61 84 S (May 22, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartford Acc. Ind. v. A. Petrucci Con., No. Cv94 31 61 84 S (May 22, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4332-WWW (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE In reverse order, the second count of the defendants counterclaim is stricken. The court's review of Connecticut General Statutes § 38a-816 does not find the claims made by the defendant to be included in the numerous definitions of unfair practices.

The first count is also stricken. The CUTPA claim must fail because a CUIPA claim has not first been established. Lees v.Middlesex Insurance Co., 229 Conn. 842 (1994); Mead v. Burns,199 Conn. 615 (1986).

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER, JUDGE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connecticut Ass'n of Health Care Facilities, Inc. v. Worrell
508 A.2d 743 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1986)
Lees v. Middlesex Insurance
643 A.2d 1282 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 4332-WWW, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartford-acc-ind-v-a-petrucci-con-no-cv94-31-61-84-s-may-22-1996-connsuperct-1996.