Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.

113 S. Ct. 1070
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 22, 1993·No. No. 92-298·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

The petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 1070 (U.S. 1993).

113 S. Ct. 1070 (Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Gentiva Securities Litigation
281 F.R.D. 108 (E.D. New York, 2012)
Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.
865 A.2d 1247 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2004)
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. LaBranche & Co.
229 F.R.D. 395 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Sofran v. Labranche & Co.
220 F.R.D. 398 (S.D. New York, 2004)
In Re American Family Enterprises
256 B.R. 377 (D. New Jersey, 2000)
In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litigation
193 F.R.D. 162 (S.D. New York, 2000)
In re Sumitomo Copper Litigation
189 F.R.D. 274 (S.D. New York, 1999)
In re Blech Securities Litigation
187 F.R.D. 97 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Weigmann v. Glorious Food, Inc.
169 F.R.D. 280 (S.D. New York, 1996)
In Re Monarch Capital Corp.
173 B.R. 31 (D. Massachusetts, 1994)
Monarch Life Insurance v. Ropes & Gray
173 B.R. 31 (D. Massachusetts, 1994)
C.L. Grimes v. Vitalink Communications Corporation
17 F.3d 1553 (Third Circuit, 1994)
Grimes v. Vitalink Communications Corp.
17 F.3d 1553 (Third Circuit, 1994)