Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc.

Second Circuit

Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc.

440 F.2d 1355, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11219

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 1971

Docket19-1048

StatusPublished

This text of 440 F.2d 1355 (Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc., 440 F.2d 1355, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11219 (2d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

440 F.2d 1355

Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser
Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer
Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest
to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 468, Docket 35404.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1971.
Decided March 22, 1971.

Harry T. Sherman, New York City (Louis I. Newman, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Louis C. Lustenberger, Jr., New York City (Timothy D. Roble, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and CURTIN, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the dismissal of the complaint on the opinion of Judge Dooling below, Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc., 325 F.Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 2, 1970).

1

Of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI