Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc.
Opinion
Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser
Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer
Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest
to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 468, Docket 35404.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 8, 1971.
Decided March 22, 1971.
Harry T. Sherman, New York City (Louis I. Newman, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Louis C. Lustenberger, Jr., New York City (Timothy D. Roble, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and CURTIN, District judge.1
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the dismissal of the complaint on the opinion of Judge Dooling below, Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc., 325 F.Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 2, 1970).
Of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
440 F.2d 1355 (Harry Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.