Harry Brett Taylor v. State
This text of Harry Brett Taylor v. State (Harry Brett Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOURTH DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., MCFADDEN and BOGGS, JJ.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
February 14, 2013
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A0522. TAYLOR v. THE STATE. DO-020 C
DOYLE , Presiding Judge.
Harry Brett Taylor filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his
pre-trial plea in bar based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a
speedy trial. The Supreme Court of Georgia has ruled, however, that such a claim is
not directly appealable and that a defendant must follow the interlocutory appeal
procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).1 Taylor’s appeal is therefore dismissed.2
Appeal dismissed. McFadden and Boggs, JJ., concur.
1 See Sosniak v. State, 292 Ga. 35 (2) (734 SE2d 362) (2012); Stevens v. State, 292 Ga. 218 (734 SE2d 743) (2012). 2 See id. See also Morris v. State, __ Ga. App. __ (734 SE2d 926) (2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harry Brett Taylor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-brett-taylor-v-state-gactapp-2013.