Harris v. Virginia
This text of 378 U.S. 552 (Harris v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HARRIS ET AL.
v.
VIRGINIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Len W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.
Sol Goodman for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U. S. 244, and Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 552, 84 S. Ct. 1923, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1038, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-virginia-scotus-1964.