Harris v. Stucki

157 S.E.2d 507, 116 Ga. App. 371, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 819
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 12, 1967·No. 43068·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Eberhardt, Judge.

A summary judgment should be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact for submission to a jury. Holland v. Sanfax Corp., 106 Ga. App. 1 (126 SE2d 442); Dillard v. Brannan, 217 Ga. 179 (121 SE2d 768); Code Ann. § 110-1203. In making the determination of whether there is a genuine issue as to a material fact the evidence is to be construed in favor of the opposing party. McCarty v. National Life &c. Ins. Co., 107 Ga. App. 178 (129 SE2d 408). Under Code Ann. § 68-1656 (a) it becomes very material whether plaintiff stepped backward across the dividing line into the eastbound lane of traffic. There is a conflict as to this in the evidence submitted, and hence a jury issue. Denial of plaintiff’s motion was proper, but the grant of defendant’s motion was error.

Judgment affirmed in fart; reversed in fart.

Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Stucki, 157 S.E.2d 507, 116 Ga. App. 371, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 819 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

157 S.E.2d 507 (Harris v. Stucki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biggs v. McDougall
332 S.E.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Holt
166 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Harris v. Stucki
157 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)