Harris v. State

202 S.W. 958, 83 Tex. Crim. 301, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Tex. Crim. 38
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 3, 1918·No. No. 4973.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for vagrancy, a common prostitute, wherein the fine was assessed at $25.

The term of court at which the conviction occurred adjourned on December 15th. The statement of facts and bills of exceptions were not filed until January 12th'following, eight days more than the twenty which could have been allowed for that purpose. There was no order allowing any time after adjournment, hence the State’s motion to strike out the bills and statement of facts must necessarily be granted. De Friend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329; Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, and a great many other cases. Without these there is no question presented which can be.reviewed.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 202 S.W. 958, 83 Tex. Crim. 301, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 163 (Tex. 1918).

202 S.W. 958 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durham and Harris v. State
155 S.W. 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
De Friend v. State
153 S.W. 881 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)