Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Harris v. State

194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 2, 1917

DocketNo. 4457.

StatusPublished

This text of 194 S.W. 1108 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling and his punishment assessed at thirty days in tail in addition to a fine of $35.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore, it can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling and his punishment assessed at thirty days in tail in addition to a fine of $35.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore, it can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.