Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Harris v. State

194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Tex. Crim. 126 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 2, 1917·No. No. 4457.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling and his punishment assessed at thirty days in tail in addition to a fine of $35.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore, it can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of swindling and his punishment assessed at thirty days in tail in addition to a fine of $35.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore, it can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Harris v. State, 194 S.W. 1108, 81 Tex. Crim. 225, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

194 S.W. 1108 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.