Harris v. State
125 S.W.3d 395, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2004 WL 115218
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 214 →
Opinion
ORDER
Bernard Harris appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 125 S.W.3d 395, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2004 WL 115218 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
125 S.W.3d 395 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.