Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. State

125 S.W.3d 395, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2004 WL 115218

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 27, 2004

DocketNo. WD 62707

StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.W.3d 395 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. State, 125 S.W.3d 395, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2004 WL 115218 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Harris appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Harris appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 S.W.3d 395, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 74, 2004 WL 115218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-moctapp-2004.