Harris v. State

100 So. 3d 245, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18993, 2012 WL 5373496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2012·No. No. 1D10-6875·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in which the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence with the exception of certain costs imposed.

We strike the $100 indigent legal assistance lien imposed pursuant to section 938.29, Florida Statutes (2009), because the trial court did not give the appellant notice of the lien or his right to a hearing to contest the amount. See McCarthan v. State, 91 So.3d 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). On remand, the trial court may only reimpose the lien if it provides the appellant with the requisite notice. See Vaughn v. State, 65 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

We also strike the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2009), because no fine was properly imposed. See Mallory v. State, 70 So.3d 738 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 100 So. 3d 245, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18993, 2012 WL 5373496 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

100 So. 3d 245 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. State
110 So. 3d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
DeSalvo v. State
107 So. 3d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Spear v. State
109 So. 3d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)