Harris v. Moody
This text of 242 S.E.2d 321 (Harris v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaints in these suits were dismissed under CPA § 41(e) (Code Ann. § 81A-141 (e)) and Code § 3-512 as no written order was entered in either for a period of five years.
The plaintiffs contend that an agreement between counsel to continue the case entered in the record prior to the lapse of five years was sufficient to avoid the mandatory dismissal provisions of the statutes. This contention has no merit as plaintiffs had the duty squarely placed on them to obtain a written order of continuance from the court and entered in the record. Salter v. Chatham County, 136 Ga. App. 914 (222 SE2d 638).
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 S.E.2d 321, 144 Ga. App. 656, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-moody-gactapp-1978.