Harris v. Kennedy
This text of 1997 Ohio 111 (Harris v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 1211.]
HARRIS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. KENNEDY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Harris v. Kennedy, 1997-Ohio-111.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-1467—Submitted October 21, 1997—Decided December 3, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 69420. __________________ Levey & Gruhin and Harold L. Levey, for appellants. Sharon Sobol Jordan, Cleveland Director of Law, and Charles E. Hannan, Jr., Assistant Director of Law, for appellees. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 111, 80 Ohio St. 3d 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-kennedy-ohio-1997.