Harris v. Johnson Plumbing, Inc.

880 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 1884, 2004 WL 1690262
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 29, 2004
DocketNo. 39,038-WCA
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 880 So. 2d 112 (Harris v. Johnson Plumbing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harris v. Johnson Plumbing, Inc., 880 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 1884, 2004 WL 1690262 (La. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The parties to this workers’ compensation case have filed a joint motion to expedite this appeal because they agree that the judgment appealed from should be reversed or annulled. Upon examination of the record, we agree that the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”) should be reversed due to the lack of notice to the employer of the rendition of a preliminary default judgment. La. C.C.P. art. 1702(A); Benton v. International Paper Company, 35,977 (La. App.2d Cir.5/8/02), 817 So.2d 443. Accordingly, the parties’ motion is granted. Under the authority of U.R.C.A. Rule 2-11.3, we decide this case summarily without oral argument. The January 12, 2004, judgment of the OWC is reversed, and this matter is remanded to the OWC for further proceedings. Costs of this appeal are assessed equally to both parties.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Curtis
880 So. 2d 112 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 So. 2d 112, 2004 La. App. LEXIS 1884, 2004 WL 1690262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-johnson-plumbing-inc-lactapp-2004.