Harris v. Fuerst

451 U.S. 965, 101 S. Ct. 2038, 68 L. Ed. 2d 343, 49 U.S.L.W. 3824, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1902
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 4, 1981·No. No. 80-6277·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ohio dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Fuerst, 451 U.S. 965, 101 S. Ct. 2038, 68 L. Ed. 2d 343, 49 U.S.L.W. 3824, 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1902 (1981).

451 U.S. 965 (Harris v. Fuerst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Savastano
309 P.3d 1083 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2013)
William Kirsch v. Prekookeanska Plovidba
971 F.2d 1026 (Third Circuit, 1992)
Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp.
949 F.2d 826 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Lewis H. Dickerson v. Arthur Latessa
872 F.2d 1116 (First Circuit, 1989)
Turner v. Inland Tugs Co.
689 F. Supp. 612 (E.D. Louisiana, 1988)
Sanders v. United States National Bank
694 P.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
Amox v. BARGE ATB 99
587 F. Supp. 1529 (D. Alaska, 1984)
Lackie v. Niagara MacH. and Tool Works
559 F. Supp. 377 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1983)
No. 81-1928
678 F.2d 453 (Third Circuit, 1982)
Loose v. Offshore Navigation, Inc.
670 F.2d 493 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Joseph S. Harris v. H. Schuldt Reederei
657 F.2d 53 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
651 F.2d 506 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)