Harris v. Daniels

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 29, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00293·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 AMMAR HARRIS, 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-00293-CDS-NJK Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 [Docket Nos. 64, 66] CHARLES DANIELS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to amend complaint. Docket Nos. 64, 66. 12 Defendants filed responses to each motion. Docket Nos. 67, 68. Plaintiff filed a consolidated 13 reply. Docket No. 71. The motions are properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78- 14 1. 15 This case’s screening order restricted any amendments Plaintiff may make to the complaint 16 to alleging true facts to show an Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) or Rehabilitation Act 17 (“RA”) claim. Docket No. 14 at 11-12. Plaintiff was ordered to file any such amended complaint 18 no later than July 5, 2022, and to comply with certain formatting and procedural requirements.1 19 Id. The Court construes pro se filings liberally. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th 20 Cir. 2013). Pro se litigants, however, must still comply with all procedural rules and Court orders. 21 See Barnes v. Berryhill, No. 3:18-cv-00199-MMD-WGC, 2019 WL 2435674, *2 (D. Nev. June 22 10, 2019) (citing Carter v. C.I.R., 784 F.2d 1006, 1008 (9th Cir. 1986)). Plaintiff did not attempt 23 to amend his complaint until January 22, 2023, over six months after the Court-ordered filing 24 deadline. See Docket No. 60 (amended complaint filed directly to the Docket). 25 1 Plaintiff was actually ordered to file an amended complaint alleging additional facts to 26 support an ADA/RA claim no later than thirty days from the issuance of the screening order. Docket No. 14 at 11. The order was entered on June 2, 2022, which meant that Plaintiff would 27 have had to file his complaint no later than July 2, 2022. That date was a Saturday, and the following Monday was the Independence Day legal holiday. Plaintiff, therefore, was required to 28 file an amended complaint no later than July 5, 2022. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(c). 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions to amend complaint are DENIED. Docket Nos. 64, 66. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike the filing at Docket No. 60. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. a. 4 Dated: March 29, 2023 os fe 5 United'States\Magistrate Judge

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. Daniels, (D. Nev. 2023).

Harris v. Daniels (Harris v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related