Harris v. California

374 U.S. 499
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1963·No. No. 135, Misc.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. California, 374 U.S. 499 (1963).

374 U.S. 499 (Harris v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. California
374 U.S. 499 (Supreme Court, 1963)