Harriram v. Fera

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee K PRIYA HARRIRAM, Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 3696 (RA) JUDGMENT JOSEPH L. FERA, BRIAN WYNNE, DAWN EWING-MORGAN, BRIDGET BARBERA, CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, and LEHMAN COLLEGE, Defendants. □□□ K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 8, 2024, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in full. The Court has now given Harriram three opportunities to amend her pleadings, including “one more opportunity to amend the Complaint” after the Court's March 2023 Opinion. March 2023 Op. at *10. Due to Harriram's "failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed," Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962), her claims are dismissed with prejudice. See Metzler Inv. Gmbh v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 970 F.3d 133, 147 (2d Cir. 2020); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 8, 2024

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: cK (Marge Deputy Clerk