Harriram v. Fera

Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: DATE FILED: 03/16/2022 PRIYA HARRIRAM, Plaintiff, V No. 21-CV-3696 (RA) JOSEPH LUIS FERA, LEHMAN ORDER COLLEGE, and CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendants Joseph Luis Fera’s and Lehman College’s letter dated March 15, 2022. See Dkt. 60. Although Defendants are correct that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) permits a party to amend a pleading “only with the opposition party’s written consent or the court’s leave,” in light of Ms. Harriram’s pro se status, the Court will accept the amended complaint, Docket 56, as the operative complaint. See, e.g., Haber v. Collecto, Inc., 20 Civ. 6637 (AJN)(BCM), 2020 WL 7318280 (Dec. 11, 2020). No further amendments, however, will be permitted without leave of the Court. Defendants’ request for a ten-day extension from March 22, 2022 to April 1, 2022 of the deadline to respond to the amended complaint is hereby granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED. Dated: March 16, 2022 New York, New York

Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge