Harrington v. Richter

Supreme Court

Harrington v. Richter

176 L. Ed. 2d 108, 130 S. Ct. 1506, 559 U.S. 935, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1449, 78 U.S.L.W. 3479

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 22, 2010

DocketNo. 09-587

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 176 L. Ed. 2d 108 (Harrington v. Richter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrington v. Richter, 176 L. Ed. 2d 108, 130 S. Ct. 1506, 559 U.S. 935, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1449, 78 U.S.L.W. 3479 (U.S. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Does AEDPA deference apply to a state court’s summary disposition of a claim, including a claim under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 [104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674] (1984)?”

Same case below, 578 F.3d 944.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: “Does AEDPA deference apply to a state court’s summary disposition of a claim, including a claim under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 [104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674] (1984)?”

Same case below, 578 F.3d 944.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 L. Ed. 2d 108, 130 S. Ct. 1506, 559 U.S. 935, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 1449, 78 U.S.L.W. 3479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrington-v-richter-scotus-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack