Harrell v. State

17 Misc. 2d 950, 188 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3264
New York Court of Claims·Decided July 22, 1959·No. Claim No. 35803·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Sidney Squire, J.

The defendant moves, pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the claim because the claimant has not legal capacity to sue ”. Said claimant is incarcerated in Sing Sing Prison serving a sentence of 5 to 10 years.

The movant relies upon section 510 of the Penal Law, bearing the heading ‘1 Forfeiture of office and suspension of civil rights ’ ’, which suspends, during the term of claimant’s sentence, his civil right to institute or continue this negligence action with respect to matters other than those arising out of his arrest or detention * * * ”.

Claimant opposes the motion by urging that said section 510 is unconstitutional in that it violates section 1 of article I of the Constitution of our State and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

We rule that said section is not unconstitutional. The motion to dismiss the claim is granted. The claim is dismissed without prejudice to renewal when the proscription in section 510 is no longer applicable.

Short-form order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. State, 17 Misc. 2d 950, 188 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3264 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1959).

17 Misc. 2d 950 (Harrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Anonymous
79 Misc. 2d 280 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1974)
Bush v. Reid
516 P.2d 1215 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1973)
Johnson v. Rockefeller
58 F.R.D. 42 (S.D. New York, 1972)