Harrell v. State

129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 577, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 424
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1925
Docket16478
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 666 (Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. State, 129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 577, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 424 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Harrell was indicted for murder, and a verdict of voluntary manslaughter was returned. Neither the general nor the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show reversible error. Special grounds 2 and 4, which are largely relied upon for a reversal, are without merit, for the reason that the evidence set out in them, which was admitted over the objection of the movant, tended to prove malice, intent, and motive. The element of motive was conspicuous in the case, and the evidence was admissible. See, in this connection, Fountain v. State, 149 Ga. 527 (101 S. E. 294); Fraser v. State, 55 Ga. 326, and Everett v. State, 62 Ga. 65 (2). The court, having approved the verdict, properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett v. State
62 Ga. 65 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1878)
Davis v. State
39 S.E. 295 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Cawthon v. State
46 S.E. 897 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Moose v. State
89 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Fountain v. State
101 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Cooper v. State
79 S.E. 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 666, 34 Ga. App. 577, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-state-gactapp-1925.