Harrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Harrell v. State

571 So. 2d 1269, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1990 WL 93255

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 27, 1990

Docket1 Div. 779

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 571 So. 2d 1269 (Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrell v. State, 571 So. 2d 1269, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1990 WL 93255 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

[1270]*1270ON RETURN TO REMAND

BOWEN, Judge.

This Court remanded this cause to the circuit court for application of the principles of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), as interpreted by Ex parte Branch, 526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987). After an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge found that “the prosecutor has failed to provide the Court with facially race neutral reasons for its peremptory challenges which are credible under the law.”

Therefore, the judgment of conviction is reversed and this cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI