Harper v. Strutz
53 Cal. 655
This text of 53 Cal. 655 (Harper v. Strutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harper v. Strutz, 53 Cal. 655 (Cal. 1879).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, because it appears by the record that at the time the action was brought there had been no distribution of the estate of Rosanna Keenan, deceased, and Bronner was still administrator of her estate, with the will annexed.
Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wolfson v. Beatty
257 P.2d 1017 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Wilson v. Stoudamire
141 P.2d 457 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Plass v. Plass
53 P. 448 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-strutz-cal-1879.