Harper v. State

5 So. 3d 765, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 2009 WL 607495
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2009·No. 2D07-5520·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Larry David Harper appeals the imposition of a 33.4-month sentence following his no contest plea to charges of criminal mischief, felony petit theft, and burglary of a structure. He claims that the scoresheet erroneously included 3.1 points for two additional offenses that the State dropped as part of the plea agreement. The State concedes that the scoresheet is incorrect. Mr. Harper preserved this issue for appeal *766 by filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct a sentencing error. 1 See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(d); Jackson v. State, 988 So.2d 562, 572 (Fla.2008) (noting that scoresheet error is sentencing error properly preserved through a rule 3.800(b) motion); State v. Anderson, 905 So.2d 111, 118 (Fla.2005) (same).

We reverse and remand for resentenc-ing.

CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
1

. Because the trial court did not rule on Mr. Harper’s motion within sixty days of filing, the motion is deemed denied. See Henson v. State, 977 So.2d 736, 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. State, 5 So. 3d 765, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2016, 2009 WL 607495 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

5 So. 3d 765 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shorter v. State
14 So. 3d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)