Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harper v. State

988 So. 2d 1212, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423, 2008 WL 3852099

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 2008·No. No. 1D08-1101·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Lane v. State, 981 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“Apprendi does not apply in this case because the scoring of victim injury points ... did not result in a sentence above the prescribed statutory maximum.”); see also Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169, 1177 (Fla.1986) (“Counsel cannot be labeled ineffective for failing to raise issues which have no merit.”).

ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Lane v. State, 981 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“Apprendi does not apply in this case because the scoring of victim injury points ... did not result in a sentence above the prescribed statutory maximum.”); see also Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169, 1177 (Fla.1986) (“Counsel cannot be labeled ineffective for failing to raise issues which have no merit.”).

ALLEN, DAVIS, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Harper v. State, 988 So. 2d 1212, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13423, 2008 WL 3852099 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

988 So. 2d 1212 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related