Harper v. Avco Financial Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harper v. Avco Financial Services, Inc.

183 S.E.2d 89, 124 Ga. App. 6, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 767, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 790

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 4, 1971

Docket45975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 183 S.E.2d 89 (Harper v. Avco Financial Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. Avco Financial Services, Inc., 183 S.E.2d 89, 124 Ga. App. 6, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 767, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 790 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the .grant of a summary judgment for the plaintiff in a suit to foreclose a security agreement on a 1962 automobile in the possession of the appellant. The stipulated facts show that the former owner gave a bill of sale to secure debt to plaintiff dated July 30, 1967; that he later sold the automobile to appellant for value; that appellant applied to register the vehicle and was issued a *7 license tag receipt on March 24, 1970; and that plaintiff recorded its claim of lien or security interest on July 9, 1970.

Submitted March 8, 1971 Decided June 4, 1971. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Leonard N. Steinberg, for appellee.

The sole question is priority of claims. A title certificate is not required for a pre-1963 automobile; however, the only way to perfect a security interest in any automobile since the enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code is by filing under the Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title Act. Code Ann § 68-406 (a); Staley v. Phelan Finance Corp., 116 Ga. App. 1 (156 SE2d 201). This court has held that a late-perfected security interest is not retroactively valid against an innocent third party who acquired the automobile for value. First Nat. Bank &c. Co. v. Smithloff, 119 Ga. App. 284 (167 SE2d 190).

The trial court erred in granting a summary judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Eberhardt and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the .grant of a summary judgment for the plaintiff in a suit to foreclose a security agreement on a 1962 automobile in the possession of the appellant. The stipulated facts show that the former owner gave a bill of sale to secure debt to plaintiff dated July 30, 1967; that he later sold the automobile to appellant for value; that appellant applied to register the vehicle and was issued a *7 license tag receipt on March 24, 1970; and that plaintiff recorded its claim of lien or security interest on July 9, 1970.

Submitted March 8, 1971 Decided June 4, 1971. Preston L. Holland, for appellant. Leonard N. Steinberg, for appellee.

The sole question is priority of claims. A title certificate is not required for a pre-1963 automobile; however, the only way to perfect a security interest in any automobile since the enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code is by filing under the Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title Act. Code Ann § 68-406 (a); Staley v. Phelan Finance Corp., 116 Ga. App. 1 (156 SE2d 201). This court has held that a late-perfected security interest is not retroactively valid against an innocent third party who acquired the automobile for value. First Nat. Bank &c. Co. v. Smithloff, 119 Ga. App. 284 (167 SE2d 190).

The trial court erred in granting a summary judgment for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Eberhardt and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E.2d 89, 124 Ga. App. 6, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 767, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-avco-financial-services-inc-gactapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack