Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.

Eleventh Circuit

Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.

781 F.2d 1550, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 1986

Docket84-3756

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 781 F.2d 1550 (Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., Harold Raymond Hooks v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc., 781 F.2d 1550, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153 (11th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 11-12-85, 11 Cir., 775 F.2d 1433).

Before RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD *, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED. This being an interlocutory appeal for the purpose of getting a single question decided, there has been no decision here as to whether the State’s library plan is sufficient to meet the requirements of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977), and we make no observations as to what is necessary in a particular case to meet those standards.

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI