Harold J. Taylor v. Mary L. Ransom-Taylor
This text of Harold J. Taylor v. Mary L. Ransom-Taylor (Harold J. Taylor v. Mary L. Ransom-Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ July 18, 2018
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A1932. HAROLD J. TAYLOR v. MARY L. RANSOM-TAYLOR.
Harold J. Taylor filed a direct appeal from a trial court order denying his motion for partial summary judgment. The denial of a motion for summary judgment, however, must be appealed in accordance with the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994); Sharpe’s Appliance Store v. Anderson, 161 Ga. App. 112 (289 SE2d 312) (1982). Because Taylor failed to comply with the requisite interlocutory procedures, this appeal is premature and is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/18/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harold J. Taylor v. Mary L. Ransom-Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harold-j-taylor-v-mary-l-ransom-taylor-gactapp-2018.