Haro, III v. Thomas Keller Restaurant Group

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided June 3, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-02113·Unknown

Opinion

1 ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7785 2 DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13285 3 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 4 300 South 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 5 Telephone: (702) 577-9300 Facsimile: (702) 255-2858 6 E-Mail: rlarsen@grsm.com 7 dwrenn@grsm.com

8 Attorneys for Defendants, KRM, Inc. dba Thomas Keller Restaurant Group and KVP, LP dba Bouchon at the Venetian 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 FERNANDO HARO III, an individual, ) CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-02113-APG-DJA ) 13 Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ) EXTEND TIME FOR 14 vs. ) DEFENDANTS TO FILE

) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S 15 K RER SM T, A IN UC R. A d N.b T.a G T RH OO UM PA , aS FK oE reL igL nE CR o rporation; ) THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 a Vn Ed N K EV TP IA, L NP ” ,d a.b F.a o r“ eB igO nU LC imH iO teN d A LiT a bT ilH itE y ) ) (First Request) 17 Company, ) ) 18 Defendants. ) ) 19

20 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, 21 Plaintiff Fernando Haro, III, appearing in pro se (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants KRM, Inc. dba 22 Thomas Keller Restaurant Group (“KRM”) and KVP, LP dba Bouchon at the Venetian 23 (“Bouchon”) (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their counsel Dione C. Wrenn, Esq., of 24 the law firm Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP (collectively, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate 25 and agree to extend the time for Defendants to file their response(s) to Plaintiff’s Third Amended 26 Complaint [ECF No. 85] from May 20, 2022 to June 3, 2022. 27 Defendants request additional time in order to sufficiently address the numerous 1 || Further, the parties are in the midst of settlement negotiations and wish to avoid unnecessary 2 || expenditures. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants’ requested extension. 3 Accordingly, Defendants shall have until June 3, 2022 to file their response(s) to 4 || Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 || DATED this 27" day of May 2022. DATED this 27th day of May 2022. 7 || GORDON REES SCULLY 3 MANSUKHANI g ||_4/Dione C. Wrenn /s/ Fernando Haro ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. FERNANDO HARO, II 10 || Nevada Bar No. 7785 PO Box 81972 DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Las Vegas, NV 89180 11 |} Nevada Bar No. 13285 Plaintiff in Pro Se 300 South 4" Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 13 || Attorneys for Defendants, 3 KRM, Inc. dba Thomas Keller Restaurant = 14 || Group and KVP, LP dba Bouchon at the Venetian as” 15

5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 OQ) 19 CO? SN 20 DANIEL J. ALBREGIS 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 DATED: June 3, 2022 23 24 25 26 27 28 ry

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haro, III v. Thomas Keller Restaurant Group, (D. Nev. 2022).

Haro, III v. Thomas Keller Restaurant Group (Haro, III v. Thomas Keller Restaurant Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.