Haro, III v. Thomas Keller Restaurant Group

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: February 9, 2022
• Docket: 2:20-cv-02113
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 FERNANDO HARO III P.O. BOX 81972 2 LAS VEGAS, NV 89180 3 (702) 918-1910 fernando.haro.iii@gmail.com 4 IN PROPER PERSON 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 FERNANDO HARO III, an individual; CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-02113-APG-DJA 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO 11 KRM, INC. d.b.a. “THOMAS KELLER EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO 12 RESTAURANT GROUP”, a foreign FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF corporation; and KVP, LP d.b.a. “BOUCHON MOTIONS TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S 13 AT THE VENETIAN,” a foreign Limited REPLIES TO THEIR MOTIONS TO 14 Liability Company; DISMISS

15 Defendants. (Second Request) 16

17 18 Pursuant to Local Rule IA 7-1, Plaintiff Fernando Haro III, in proper person, and 19 Defendants KRM, Inc, d.b.a Thomas Keller Restaurant Group (“KRM”) and KVP, LP d.b.a. 20 Bouchon at the Venetian (“Bouchon”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their 21 22 attorneys, Robert S. Larsen, Esq. and Dione C. Wrenn, Esq. of the law firm of Gordon Rees 23 Scully Mansukhani LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 24 25 1. On January 12, 2022, Plaintiff filed Motions to Strike Defendants’ Replies to their 26 Motions to Dismiss. ECF No. 57 & 58. 27 28 1 1 2. On January 25, 2022, Defendants filed their responses in Opposition to Plaintiff’s 2 Motion to Strike Replies to their Motions to Dismiss. ECF No. 64 & 65. 3 3. The initial deadline for Plaintiff to file a reply in support of his Motions to Strike 4 was February 1, 2022. 5 6 4. Due to illness, Plaintiff was unable to file his replies by February 1, 2022. 7 5. Plaintiff requested a one (1) week extension to February 8, 2022, to file his replies. 8 6. Due to continued illness, Plaintiff is unable to file his replies by February 8, 2022. 9 7. Plaintiff requests an additional one (1) week extension to February 15, 2022, to 10 file his replies. 11 12 8. There are currently no scheduled hearings in this case and Plaintiff’s sought 13 extension will not unduly delay the proceedings. 14 9. Defendants do not oppose an extension up to and including February 15, 2022. 15 10. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have until February 15, 2022, to file his reply in 16 support of his Motion for Leave to File Declaration and Additional Evidence. 17 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 2 1 ||DATED this 8th day of February 2022 DATED this 8th day of February 2022 2 GORDON REES SCULLY FERNANDO HARO II 3 || MANSUKHANI 4 5 Dione C. Wrenn /s/ Fernando Haro 6 |} ROBERT S. LARSEN, ESQ. FERNANDO HARO III Nevada Bar No. 7785 P.O. Box 81972 7 DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Las Vegas, NV 89180 g || Nevada Bar No. 13285 Plaintiff in Proper Person 300 South 4" Street, Suite 1550 9 Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendants, 10 KRM, Inc, d.b.a. Thomas Keller Restaurant 11 ||Group and KVP, LP d.b.a. Bouchon at the Venetian 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 DATED: February 9, 2022 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28