Harms v. Mayor of Savannah
This text of 89 S.E. 780 (Harms v. Mayor of Savannah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John T>. Harms instituted an action for damages against the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition, which was overruled. Error was duly assigned; and the judgment of the trial court'was reversed (143 Ga. 790, 85 S. E. 1040). Before the remittitur from the Supreme Court had been made the judgment of the. superior court, the plaintiff tendered an amendment to his petition. Objections were interposed to the allowance of the amendment, and after hearing argument from counsel the objections were sustained and the amendment disallowed. In a direct bill of exceptions sued out by the plaintiff, the only assignment of error was upon the judgment disallowing the amendment. Held: There being no assignment of error upon a final judgment, tlfe exceptions to the order disallowing the amendment can not be considered, and the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions will be granted. Ellington v. Automobile Credit Sales Co., 145 Ga. 53 (88 S. E. 565); Hester v. Mallary [729]*729Machinery Co., 142 Ga. 320 (82 S. E. 884) ; Prater v. Crawford, 143 Ga. 709 (85 S. E. 829); Lyndon v. Georgia Railway &c. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 780, 145 Ga. 728, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harms-v-mayor-of-savannah-ga-1916.