Harms v. Mayor of Savannah

89 S.E. 780, 145 Ga. 728, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 460
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

John T>. Harms instituted an action for damages against the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition, which was overruled. Error was duly assigned; and the judgment of the trial court'was reversed (143 Ga. 790, 85 S. E. 1040). Before the remittitur from the Supreme Court had been made the judgment of the. superior court, the plaintiff tendered an amendment to his petition. Objections were interposed to the allowance of the amendment, and after hearing argument from counsel the objections were sustained and the amendment disallowed. In a direct bill of exceptions sued out by the plaintiff, the only assignment of error was upon the judgment disallowing the amendment. Held: There being no assignment of error upon a final judgment, tlfe exceptions to the order disallowing the amendment can not be considered, and the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions will be granted. Ellington v. Automobile Credit Sales Co., 145 Ga. 53 (88 S. E. 565); Hester v. Mallary [729] Machinery Co., 142 Ga. 320 (82 S. E. 884) ; Prater v. Crawford, 143 Ga. 709 (85 S. E. 829); Lyndon v. Georgia Railway &c. Co., 129 Ga. 353 (58 S. E. 1047).

August 18, 1916. Rehearing denied September 12, 1916. Writ' of error; from Chatham. Motion to dismiss. Twiggs & Gazan, for plaintiff. D. 8. Atkinson, John Rourke Jr., and R. J. Travis, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harms v. Mayor of Savannah, 89 S.E. 780, 145 Ga. 728, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 460 (Ga. 1916).

89 S.E. 780 (Harms v. Mayor of Savannah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wills v. Manning
19 S.E.2d 522 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Huson v. Bank of Covington
123 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Burkhalter v. Roach
90 S.E. 52 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)